Some Korans and other materials were being used by terrorists in custody to send each other coded messages. These items were intercepted and disposed of properly according to Islamic law. How are you supposed to dispose of a Koran in Islamic Law? BY BURNING IT. The durka durk agitators, who know this full well, incited people to form mobs and attack various western targets in Afganistan. The last time this happend we learned that Taliban butchers had been insinuated into the mobs to do the actual assaults.
But something else happend. Some graves of Allied WWII soldiers who fought and died in Libya during WWII were smashed. Why? The perpetraitors said it was because a few korans were burnt in Afganistan.
Islamists ALWAYS lie about their motivations for doing anything.
They did not smash these graves because of any Koran burning. In fact they know the Korans were disposed of properly. They had obviously wanted to smash the graves for some time but wanted to do it behind the excuse of a casus belli.
Such casus belli hides the act in amongst a bunch of other activity taking place around the world so it cannot be responded to on its own. Using phoney justifications also provides a shield from criticism. "They did it only because they were mad at something we did." It also provides a rhetorical shield because the desecration will now be discussed in conjunction with something the perpetraitors know it really doesn't have anything to do with.
But it's ALWAYS a lie. They had another reason for doing this and waited for a good time to do it where events might provide cover and protection from negative responces.
Hampering the victims responce is just as much a part of jihad warfare as terrorism. Like it says in the chapter of the Koran that Park51 is named after (about airborn jihad (yup, you heard me, look it up)), "They could not respond".
Using the excuse of the Koran Burnings is meant to hamper the responce to this.
So what is the real purpose of this? To damage post Qu-Daffy Libyan relations with western powers. Also to "rewrite" history in the same way that smashing pre islamic artifacts in musems or burning whole libraries of pre islamic books does.
The best responce is for a Veterans group to fix the tombstones. While they are at it they can give interviews to the Libyan media about how Libyans (and other Arabs) helped save the world from Fascism in WWII.
I dunno to what Libyans did in WWII but a hell of a lot of Arabs did fight and die on the allied side in WWII AGAINST fascism and this story should be being exploited to the fullest right now.
This incident is the perfect excuse to engage in such discourse.
Here is the article at Vlad Tepes
American and allied graves smashed in Libyan WW2 cemetery
Here is the Full Article at the Daily Mail
Insult to WWII heroes
But something else happend. Some graves of Allied WWII soldiers who fought and died in Libya during WWII were smashed. Why? The perpetraitors said it was because a few korans were burnt in Afganistan.
Islamists ALWAYS lie about their motivations for doing anything.
They did not smash these graves because of any Koran burning. In fact they know the Korans were disposed of properly. They had obviously wanted to smash the graves for some time but wanted to do it behind the excuse of a casus belli.
Such casus belli hides the act in amongst a bunch of other activity taking place around the world so it cannot be responded to on its own. Using phoney justifications also provides a shield from criticism. "They did it only because they were mad at something we did." It also provides a rhetorical shield because the desecration will now be discussed in conjunction with something the perpetraitors know it really doesn't have anything to do with.
But it's ALWAYS a lie. They had another reason for doing this and waited for a good time to do it where events might provide cover and protection from negative responces.
Hampering the victims responce is just as much a part of jihad warfare as terrorism. Like it says in the chapter of the Koran that Park51 is named after (about airborn jihad (yup, you heard me, look it up)), "They could not respond".
Using the excuse of the Koran Burnings is meant to hamper the responce to this.
So what is the real purpose of this? To damage post Qu-Daffy Libyan relations with western powers. Also to "rewrite" history in the same way that smashing pre islamic artifacts in musems or burning whole libraries of pre islamic books does.
The best responce is for a Veterans group to fix the tombstones. While they are at it they can give interviews to the Libyan media about how Libyans (and other Arabs) helped save the world from Fascism in WWII.
I dunno to what Libyans did in WWII but a hell of a lot of Arabs did fight and die on the allied side in WWII AGAINST fascism and this story should be being exploited to the fullest right now.
This incident is the perfect excuse to engage in such discourse.
Here is the article at Vlad Tepes
American and allied graves smashed in Libyan WW2 cemetery
Here is the Full Article at the Daily Mail
Insult to WWII heroes
Steen Raaschou, editor of snaphanen.dk (1) suggests a new kind of crime called Dominance crime. A crime where the motive of the perpetrator is to experience dominance, rather than to achieve material gain. It is a rational yet innovative suggestion as the experience of dominance is already known to be the primary motive for rape.
Many countries have now criminalized motivation as well as action. The current motivation crimes are called hate crimes. If crimes can be hate motivated and thus garner stonger punishment, then criminalizing other motives is not an idea which comes from left field. Indeed, dominance is just as bad as hate as a motivating factor for crime.
Many crimes or antisocial behavior have their roots in documented and common primate behavior. Primates have been witnessed to engage in murder, rape, assault, adultery (ya ya I know that's not a crime) and theft. Primates also engage in behavior to establish and maintain dominance that would be criminal when done by a human.
In psychology the extreme need to dominate others is called sadism.
Sadism is not merely a need to hurt. It is an abnormal need to dominate. The pain, verbal abuse and imposed restrictions are merely methods used to achieve the feeling of dominance.
We are all aware of it as a sexual dysfunction but it is also a personality disorder known as Sadistic Personality Disorder or SPD (2).
SPD is a need to dominate others. Key to that is for the dominated to know and acknowledge that they are dominated. Does that sound familiar? You bet your burka it does.
Psychologists and anthropologists have known for some time that it is possible, thru natural selection, for cultures to have different amounts of incidence of specific disorders. Extreme examples of this phenomena have been documented in populations that are geographically remote from others.
What happens is this. A culture values a trait. Those with that trait, thru natural (or unnatural) selection have a higher chance of having offspring. As a result more people with that trait appear in the population and the expressions of that trait become stronger and stronger. The most extreme expressions of the trait are forms of insanity.
Of course it's not just biology. An individual interacts with their culture. But if that culture is geared towards extreme shows of dominance, because its been created by people who have a predisposition for displaying and valuing dominance, we see an echo chamber effect, with psychology/biology creating the culture and culture having an effect upon psychology/biology of the individual.
Did that make ANY sense? It sure wasn't easy to write.
A culture that engages in polygamy, where the most dominant men get most of the mates and less dominant men get mostly none, would exacerbate the increase in a population of those who have stronger and stronger predispositions to have a deep rooted psychological need to show dominance.
Schizophrenia, autism and retardation are not necessarily included in that theory as they can have other causes than just "natural" selection.
This is not the same as the "bell curve" nonsense. It is also not saying that humans are incapable of making rational decisions about their behavior. We do so thousands of times a day.
It is also not saying that only one people in the world experience this particular disorder. Mental disorders are merely extreme expressions of tendencies we all have.
It is also not intended to discount the effect of intentional radicalization and propoganda. Though such effects and their success do have a symbiotic relationship with culture and personal predisposition.
However it does appear to that there is a direct relationship between islam, the culture developed under islam, and the results of polygamy and an increase in more numerous and more extreme expressions of SPD.
It is a matter for Historians to determine if Muhammad is the generating factor or if the factors and their interrelationship I discuss above were already in existence in that region at the time of his birth. It is clear from the source material that he was a sadist but was that an over common psychological phenomena of the region already? If that is the case than even if Muhammad never existed, another with similar ideas would have eventually achieved the same kind of success he did because his ideas were of a sort that would gain traction in that particular culture.
The point I was trying to make in the previous paragraph is that Muhammad may not be responsible for the inception of the phenomena, but was himself and his resulting ideas, the result of an already existing process. If polygamy was already a common feature of the region than there could have been a process in motion already. Though if that is the case his ideas and the culture they produced certainly did not help matters.
Discus.
1.A new term: Dominance crime
2. Sadistic Personality Disorder A definition by Stephen J. Hucker, MB, BS, FRCP(C), FRCPsych at Forensic Psychiatry. ca